Sunday, April 11, 2010

we must rip out all the epilogues from the books that we have read

i am not a fan of the epilogue in novels. i don't really know why, but i just don't like them. okay, that's a lie because i do know why, but it doesn't change the fact that i feel epilogues are a waste of everyone's time: the author's, the editor's, the reader's. i mean, yes, sometimes (read:practically all the time) i wish the author would continue the story just a bit. i want to know about the characters' futures and what happens next. that's the sign of a good book: it leaves you wanting more. but, more often than not, epilogues end up ruining it in one of two ways.

the first is that what is labeled as the epilogue could really just be the final chapter. i dunno where exactly some of these authors went to school, but someone should've taught them that epilogues are not a necessary part of a novel. yes, every story needs a conclusion, but that doesnt have to be set off from the rest of the book. a conclusion can fit perfectly well into the normal chaptering scheme. so, if your epilogue talks about what's happening two days after the final chapter, and your book just doesn't seem complete without it, then i think you should change that "epilogue" to "chapter whatever." especially if throughout the entire book, large periods of time are skipped over with chapters beginning like "Six months later," or "The next couple of months flew by," or "Time was moving so fast, I couldn't keep track of it. Had it been one month? Two? More?"

the other way that epilogues mess up is that the writing just seems awful after everything else. it's almost like the author couldn't let go of the characters but ran out of pages to write in. so what do you do then? you cram their entire futures into three or four pages and call it a day. of course, with all the cramming, a lot of the author's writing talent gets pushed out the window. because really, you can't spare too much focus on making your writing pretty if you're using it all to get twenty years of story in for twenty different characters. a prime example of this kind of epilogue is found at the end of harry potter 7. though i've only read it once (i skip over it when i reread the book) and my initial reaction to it may be a little too harsh, i hated it. it read like a mediocre fanfiction.

though i love knowing what the character does next, if you can't fit it into the actual story or a compelling sequel, then just keep it in your head. save it for interviews. because more often than not it turns into a bad spin-off after the ending of a great show. (remember joey?)

*At the Bottom of Everything - Bright Eyes

9 comments:

  1. While I was reading this post, all I could think about was the Harry Potter epilogue. My God, what was that?! It just relegated the entire story.

    ReplyDelete
  2. yeah, when i started it i was thinking about a completely different book, but by the end all i could think about was the harry potter one. it killed me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i agree with tooly...all i could think of throughout this blog was harry potter and the awful ending..

    ReplyDelete
  4. -and harry liked ginny. so they got together. and all those people i killed? don't worry. i named after them, so their memory lives on. and the orphan, no, hey man he lived an excellenttttt life as HARRY'S special orphan kid. and you know, a bonus, i let him date the half-veela. so yeah. end of this story.

    like a frikkin burrito, she just stuck it all in. the whole 7th book was like a badly made burrito.

    ReplyDelete
  5. LOOL at your recap of the epilogue. i kinda wish that wasn't exactly like it. and the burrito comparison is genius.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The title alone made me think of Harry Potter.

    And on a completely unrelated sort of related note, the burrito comparison could be used to describe Saudi's education system. I'm just sayin'

    ReplyDelete
  7. I second (or tenth) the notion that the Harry Potter epilogue was some sort of mindless fanfiction. Kind of like a sellout "happily ever after" just because she can.

    And it was totally a terribly made burrito. I'd kinda wanna know what happened to a lot of the other people too, not just people who named their kids Albus and Brutus.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ooooh... comment form appeared.. finally :p

    I must say, in some respects I agree, but in others I disagree.

    Epilogues do serve a purpose. I use them myself as a way of telling of something not directly related to the main story that will affect things to come. My subtle hints :p As these sections are not truly part of the story, to include it as a chapter doesn't work too well.

    However, epilogues that continue the story or are "a few years later" are part of the story and should be epilogues.

    And some... like the HP one, should DIE
    Lol

    ReplyDelete
  9. i dunno why the comment form wasnt showing up. that's weird.

    anyway, i agree that some epilogues should be epilogues. i had just read a bunch of books that all ended in epilogues that should have been the last chapter, and it annoyed me.

    and lool i'm glad everyone agrees that the harry potter epilogue was perhaps the worst piece of fiction ever published.

    ReplyDelete